tahariels:

i-boudicca-i replied to your post: Quick fact-checking America question: do you guys…

Never seen ‘em before. Which is very sad indeed, having seen them now.

unforgott3n replied to your post: Quick fact-checking America question: do you guys…

the closest you’d really get to this kind of thing here would be waffle fries, curly fries, etc.

We also get these:

and these:

I saw the smiley-face potatoes at my grocery store this morning! 😀 Not sure about what all else might be there (I wasn’t specifically looking for anything, just glancing at the shelves as I went by), though I know they also carry dinosaur-shaped chicken nuggets, so I expect there is other stuff, too.

So Colorado, at least for one, has fun-shaped frozen foods. :9

azryal00:

megneato:

spiftynifty:

codenamecesare:

Ways Erik looks at Charles.

#The way Erik adjusts his fingers in the 3rd gif, from both being on Charles’ coat sleeve to one moving just enough to touch Charles’ skin.

#The last gif, where Charles just quickly pats Erik, has always struck me as awkward because even though we don’t really see them being touchy-feely with each other, the intensity of their chemistry is so strong at this point that such a gesture feels strange. Every time I see this scene arcanewinter’s line in her fic A Measure of Peace comes to mind: “…clapping Erik on the shoulder in some awkward assurance that he did in fact know the sort of contact they were supposed to be having”. That is what this feels like. Moira just interrupted something incredibly intimate (Erik having performance issues and Charles “going inside” him and reminding him he’s good, enabling Erik to “get it up”, both of them crying along the way), kind of reminding the boys of their situation and causing them (or Charles anyway) to revert back to what is “acceptable” by society. Don’t forget folks, Charles is afraid of being visibly different. That’s why he’s afraid of Raven slipping up and showing who she really is. He knows society isn’t ready for whatever he and Erik are(even in the most non-romantic canon these are two men eternally bound to each other). So instead he gives Erik this awkward good-job-dude pat and doesn’t wait up for him. And Erik just stands there still kinda winded by it all.

Or maybe I’m just reading into too much here. I need some sequel news before I start going through this movie framebyframe for more headcanons.

And I would not mind at all if you framebyframed the movie.

Ditto. 

You could do a whole blog of this.

Human beings took our animal need for palatable food … and turned it into chocolate souffles with salted caramel cream. We took our ability to co-operate as a social species … and turned it into craft circles and bowling leagues and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. We took our capacity to make and use tools … and turned it into the Apollo moon landing. We took our uniquely precise ability to communicate through language … and turned it into King Lear.

None of these things are necessary for survival and reproduction. That is exactly what makes them so splendid. When we take our basic evolutionary wiring and transform it into something far beyond any prosaic matters of survival and reproduction … that’s when humanity is at its best. That’s when we show ourselves to be capable of creating meaning and joy, for ourselves and for one another. That’s when we’re most uniquely human.

And the same is true for sex. Human beings have a deep, hard-wired urge to replicate our DNA, instilled in us by millions of years of evolution. And we’ve turned it into an intense and delightful form of communication, intimacy, creativity, community, personal expression, transcendence, joy, pleasure, and love. Regardless of whether any DNA gets replicated in the process.

Why should we see this as sinful? What makes this any different from chocolate souffles and King Lear?

Greta Christina (via histrionicintrovert, sexisnottheenemy) (via etirabys)