Would you happen to know why we keep seeing Sherlock’s smoking habit fluctuate? In the first series he has quit, in series two it seems like he may have relapsed after ASiB and is going cold turkey in HoB. Then in series three we have him trying to quit again in TSoT, and smoking with Mycroft in HLV. Is there a deeper meaning or is it just a plot point?

myownwhatsoever:

loudest-subtext-in-television-d:

I’m going to cover in depth in the S&S series, but quickly:

A Study in Pink – Sherlock is on nicotine patches.

The Blind Banker – Sherlock says on his website he’s not smoking even though he’d kill someone for a cigarette.

The Great Game – during the Janus Cars sequence, Sherlock reminds John he’s on nicotine patches.

The Sign of Three lets us know that Sherlock started smoking after the pool scene, and before he ever met Irene Adler: he already knew John’s middle name when John says it to Irene because Sherlock got a copy of John’s birth certificate. So:

John blew Sherlock’s mind when he offered to die for him at the pool, and then Sherlock and John were willing to die together in an explosion before Moriarty got the phone call. Sherlock, unsurprisingly, finds it difficult to maintain his strict “caring is not an advantage” stance in the face of that.

This is when the TSoT footage kicks in. It corresponds perfectly to Sherlock’s obsession with John and John’s blog — and thus his obsession with what John thinks of him — that we see at the beginning of A Scandal in Belgravia. Both montages are supposed to cover months of time as they do other cases together, and this is literally the ONLY point in the show where the TSoT footage fits. And it fits perfectly.

After the pool, Sherlock finds himself rethinking everything he ever thought about sentiment and it’s driving him insane. He’ll tell Irene at the end that he’s “always assumed love is a dangerous disadvantage” and a “chemical defect found in the losing side” so he’s dealing with some pretty heavy stuff. Sherlock sees cases every day where people are in love and do horrible shit to each other because of it.

Before Irene is ever in the picture, Sherlock starts smoking like a maniac and wanting to know everything about John. Stupid shit that you’d think Sherlock would delete or find too tedious to seek out. He “confiscates” John’s laptop because John looks at naked women on it. He reads John’s e-mails to his girlfriends. He gets a copy of John’s birth certificate because John won’t tell him his middle name.

Sherlock has it bad.

By the time Irene shows up and then “dies,” it doesn’t mean anything for Irene when Sherlock takes the cigarette from Mycroft at the morgue. He’s been smoking over John this whole time.

Sherlock constantly has John’s blog open during ASiB — he doesn’t just look at it over John’s shoulder when he’s writing it, Sherlock keeps it open on his own laptop. When Sherlock first begins composing sad music, it’s nothing to do with Irene: John asks about what he’s composing, Sherlock says it helps him think, and then points to John’s open blog on his laptop. Sherlock was composing that music while reading John’s blog. And which entry specifically? The one where a gay guy kills his boyfriend. A “dangerous disadvantage” indeed.

Meanwhile, this whole time John has been saying some frankly mean things about Sherlock on his blog, which Sherlock has already been bitter about since the beginning of The Great Game. Sherlock knows John thinks he’s a heartless asshole (he tells Moriarty as much at the pool scene). And John is straight — the girlfriends, the straight porn (like John would be stupid enough to look at gay porn with Sherlock always guessing his passwords) — so. There’s no point to even entertaining the idea and Sherlock can never even really face what he’s feeling. But it all comes out in his violin.

Then Irene comes back and he overhears that conversation that breaks his brain, because Irene says they’re a couple and seems to be implying John is in love with him, but John SAYS he’s not gay and that’s what Sherlock has always thought, so. John just isn’t gay. Irene is always trying to mess with them, who knows what she was trying to do. Or she’s just wrong. John writes such awful things about Sherlock, so she can’t be right.

Then Irene was in love with him and used him for a deduction and embarrassed him in front of Mycroft. That’s what love is worth.

No wonder Sherlock is screaming for cigarettes by the start of The Hounds of Baskerville, huh?

You’re evil. And probably right. Oh my God.

A small addition: During TSoT, when Sherlock is researching Major Sholto (on the day following the stag night) the ads that show up on that page and the ghost dating site are for nicotine patches (NicoBud) – I’m sure everyone is aware that ads tend to be determined by what a person has been browsing.

Both ads are for “Step 1,” which could mean that Sherlock had only recently stopped smoking.


http://crowfooted.tumblr.com/post/75317023594/audio_player_iframe/crowfooted/tumblr_m1z5zxdUWV1r3ef9z?audio_file=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tumblr.com%2Faudio_file%2Fcrowfooted%2F75317023594%2Ftumblr_m1z5zxdUWV1r3ef9z

chewedupculture:

Take On Me – A-Ha
Shying away
I’ll be coming for your love, OK?
Take on me, take me on
I’ll be gone
In a day or two

IMPORTANT!!! Why You Should Be Freaking Out About The End Of Net Neutrality

prettyarbitrary:

acquaintedwithrask:

jimfear138:

isaidwhat:

ofpotterandwho:

Net neutrality is dead

At least that’s the verdict of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which today struck down a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) order from 2010 that forced Internet service providers (ISPs) like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast and Time Warner Cable to abide by the principles of network neutrality. These principles broadly stipulate that ISP network management must be transparent, and that ISPs can’t engage in practices that block, stifle or discriminate against (lawful) websites or traffic types on the Internet.

That’s the bare bones story, wrapped in ugly acronyms (FCC, ISP, etc.). But why should you care that network neutrality (“net neutrality”) may be gone for good?

1. No more net neutrality means ISPs can now discriminate against content they dislike.

Everyone gets their Internet from an Internet service provider — an ISP like AT&T, Verizon, Comcast or Time Warner Cable. Under net neutrality rules, these ISPs have to treat all content you access over the Internet “roughly the same way“ — they can’t speed up traffic from websites they like or delay competitor’s traffic.

Now, with net neutrality gone, ISPs can discriminate, favoring their business partners while delaying or blocking websites they don’t like. Think your cable CEO hates free online porn? Now you’ll know for sure!

2. No more net neutrality means ISPs can now force websites to PAY for faster content delivery.

You know how some sites you go to just load slower than others? Usually, that’s just because the slower site is image heavy, poorly coded, or dealing with intense server load. But with net neutrality gone, ISPs can now start charging hefty fees to websites that want quick content delivery — shifting the long load times to poorer sites that can’t pay up.

Prefer indie retailers to Amazon.com? You may be in for a frustrating future.

3. Destroying net neutrality is bad for small businesses.

Put together items one and two and it becomes clear — negating net neutrality is bad for small businesses. If ISPs force website owners pay for faster load times, tiny retailers and personal websites will be the ones to suffer from slower content delivery.

Alternately — or additionally — ISPs will have no reason not to favor partner sites: Time Warner Cable, for instance, might favor the website of CNN (owned by the Time Warner Corporation) over the websites of competing cable news networks MSNBC and Fox News. Still, it’s the indies again that will lose out here. While Time Warner Cable might favor CNN and Comcast MSNBC, independent news networks almost certainly won’t get special treatment from any ISPs. Expand this out to music sites, web publishing, etc., and you begin to see the problem.

In extreme cases, ISPs may hinder or block content that isn’t produced by partners —much like AT&T did when it owned the telephone networks back in the day.

4. Without net neutrality, entire types of online traffic (like Netflix) may be in jeopardy.

Netflix watchers and BitTorrent users might want to beware — soon your beloved services may not work like they used to. Now that net neutrality’s down for the count, ISPs can discriminate against entire types of traffic: For instance, an ISP could slow or block all peer-to-peer file sharing, or all online video streaming.

Think it sounds unbelievably stupid for an ISP to stifle a certain traffic types indiscriminately? Comcast has seen reason to stifle both streaming video and peer-to-peer in the past.

From an ISP’s perspective, discriminating against some traffic types makes business sense: Many ISPs are also cable television providers, which means the “cord-cutting” enabled by peer-to-peer and streaming online video isn’t good for their bottom line.

5. Without net neutrality, your ISPs can make even more money without actually improving the Internet.

Right now, America’s broadband is slow. It’s slow because ISPs can already make gobs of money by charging the rich a ton for high-quality Internet while leaving the rest of America with subpar (or no) service.

Now, with net neutrality gone, ISPs will be able to make even more money off their existing customer base. They won’t need to improve service or bring broadband to rural areas because they’ll be able to keep growing (financially, at least) by charging content providers more for faster delivery and charging customers more for faster access. In all likelihood, Tuesday’s ruling means the problems with America’s Internet will be magnified.

This FINALLY shows up on my dashboard and it only has 300 notes.  

image

Here’s a petition on Whitehouse.gov that needs 88,000+ by the middle of February:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/restore-net-neutrality-directing-fcc-classify-internet-providers-common-carriers/5CWS1M4P

SIGNAL BOOST THE FUCK OUT OF THIS SHIT AND LET THEM KNOW THAT WE AIN’T HAVIN’ IT!

SIGN IT

Yeah, I’m beating this horse because IT AIN’T DEAD ENOUGH.

Look, here is the deal.  The FCC has different categories of stuff it regulates.  Level 1 is ‘telecommunications.’  I.e. services that provide the fundamental building blocks of communications in this country.

Level 2 is ‘information services.’  This is stuff that is useful, yes, but if somebody fucks with it a bit then you’re not fundamentally disrupting, redefining, or controlling life as American citizens live it.

Back in 2002, the FCC (for reasons unknown to God or man) decided to label The Internet, as ‘information services.’

So now, when people tried to pass a big ol’ law through Congress that says, “ISPs aren’t allowed to fuck with internet traffic or play favorites,” the courts said, “That’s not allowed, if you’re going to label the Internet as a category 2 service.  However, we really highly advise the FCC to change the Internet to category 1 service, because we don’t know what you guys are smoking over there but even WE can tell that’s what it should be.  In which case we’ll give this bill the stamp of approval so hard that the paper’ll smoke afterwards.”

So BASICALLY this is SUPER-EASY TO FIX, and all it needs is for the FCC to get off its apparently addled duff and make the change.  

Which is what these petitions are for.

So seriously.  SIGN THEM.

IMPORTANT!!! Why You Should Be Freaking Out About The End Of Net Neutrality

moni158:

Girl and her dragon growing up and growing old together and stuff. ( I picture dragons having very long lives so it would suck making human friends OTL ) It started as just the first pic but then I wanted to draw the dragon after it hatched and then it just continued from then on…

I am sure its by no means an original concept so I’m gonna add mine to the pile of mythical creature friendships  🙂

I’m having a horrible artblock so I’m just finishing up doodles I did at work over 4-5 months ago or something OTL

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started