

I case someone want to experiment what real terror is go here it’s in english.
WHY WOULD YOU SOURCE THAT.
BECAUSE IM AN EVIL ASSHAT WIZARD THATS WHY
NOPE NOPE NO NO NO NONONONONONONON BYE
I’d seen this before, but it had been long enough that I didn’t really remember it so I followed the link.
#regret
reblog if you like Sherlock and John being switches in bed.
Mary shot Sherlock for the same reason that John shot the cabbie in A Study in Pink and Sherlock shot Magnussen at the end of His Last Vow: sentiment.
John is Mary’s pressure point. There is nothing she would not do to protect him. Even if it means killing his best friend. It’s not understandable for us as an audience because we see this from Sherlock’s point of view. He is our main character. And Mary shot him.
But what if Sherlock would have shot Mary for the exact same reasons as she shot him, wouldn’t that have been plausible for us? That Sherlock would do whatever it takes to protect John? Because that is what Mary is doing in her own way, perhaps it’s not the right way but she’s doing it because she loves John, nothing else.
“Love is a much more vicious motivatior”… I couldn’t find a plausible explanation why Mary would shoot Sherlock but now I have and this is it. Love.
No, a thousand times over. She shot him because she is selfish and would rather keep John to herself and see him mourn his best friend (a process which almost destroyed him and which she witnessed firsthand) than buy herself time by knocking Sherlock out instead of shooting him, or negotiating with Sherlock to keep her secret. This isn’t love, it is greed and manipulation.
What hazeltea said. Mary’s action was out of a very selfish love. She chose to risk the death of John’s best friend—the man whose loss nearly BROKE HIM the first time—rather than TAKE THE RISK of losing John’s affections (as we see later, in fact John does accept her).
Contrast this against Sherlock’s love for John which, even when they are at their worst with each other, includes Sherlock being willing to put his life on the line and also handing John off to the love of another person even though it means he will have less of John’s time and attention for himself. THAT is selfless. (Not that Sherlock is always selfless when it comes to John, but he’s got a hell of a lot better grasp on it than Mary does.)
Mary might have called an ambulance for Sherlock, she might have given him a chance, but it was ONLY a chance. She did NOT save his life, no matter what Sherlock argues to John. For one thing, she’s the person who made the ambulance necessary in the first place. If you stab somebody and then sew it up for them, it doesn’t negate the stabbing.
For another, WHERE she shot Sherlock. In the upper abdomen, just below his rib cage. Do you know what’s there? Stomach, liver, intestines, spleen.
That is all soft tissue. Very delicate tissue. A gunshot wound acts on the soft tissues of the human body like an impact in water or a sonic boom in the air. It creates a traumatic shockwave that ripples out from the bullet hole itself and through the tissues to rupture and crush them. In fact, for a split second after the bullet enters the body, it creates what’s called cavitation. This basically means ‘the splash.’ Living flesh is actually smashed open in an entry channel significantly larger than the bullet itself (this is why higher caliber is so much more damaging; the cavitation is significantly greater) and then pushes closed again. All those soft, delicate, easily damaged organs in there—any or all of them could have been damaged beyond repair.
Granted that the suppressor would have slowed the bullet and removed some portion of the force that does the worst of that damage. But even if she was such a perfect shot she could thread the bullet between the stomach, intestines and spleen, all that would mean is that it had a chance of damaging all three.
Mary’s ‘surgical shot’ was more accurately a great way to doom someone to a slow, especially painful, almost certain death. The only reason Sherlock woke up again was because she was LUCKY, and Sherlock was too stubborn to die.
Or because the writers have decided to go for the Hollywood approach to guns.
This is not to say you should hate Mary or assume she doesn’t care about John. But understand that she is, as CAM said, very much not a good person. People who can kill others professionally are seldom angels aside from that.
If you have a child and they are creeped out by a nephew or older brother touching them or looking at them a certain way, you need to have a serious talk with that person and keep them the hell away from your child. Don’t minimize it or tell your kid to hug them anyway, that kid is picking up danger signals they don’t even understand yet. But so many families will tell that kid they are being a brat.
thankyou
Also family friends, and really just about anyone. Just because you think someone is trustworthy, if your kid thinks something is wrong, maybe it’s time to reconsider your view of that person.
It’s not that I feel like I should be the most important.
I just don’t want to be reminded that I’m always the least important.

Stalactite supervisor John Sato examines new formations with disappointment.
“A proper stalactite grows downward,” said Sato, “But these younger stalactites are rebellious and have little respect for tradition. We’ve caught them growing sideways, diagonally, I saw one just yesterday that grew down at first but then went straight back up again into the rock ceiling.”
Numerous theories abound as to why the stalactites are growing more bold. Some blame global warming for chemical shifts in the dripping minerals. Others feel television is to blame. But Sato has another theory:
“Many stalactites today come from modern rock. Classic rock held superior morals and produced straight stalactites. But modern rock, such as hard rock or acidic rock aren’t so solid. To keep stalactites on course, we must examine both the rocks and the role played by the minerals, the substance they communicate downward. Only with a comprehensive study of rock and role will we come to an understanding of the problem, and begin to move toward a solution. Such as an opaline silica solution, or a 50% fluorite solution.”
Others feel that blaming rock is a cop-out, and that the problem lies with society’s standard of binary geological roles. Said Peter Saenz of GLAAD (Geological Land Appraisal And Diagnostics), “Who are we to say a stalactite has to be straight and hook up with a stalagmite? Maybe some stalactites are meant to meet other stalactites, maybe some stalactites want to find their own way through the caves. It’s not for us to dictate.”
This viewpoint has proven controversial, with high ranking clergy at the Vatican stating, “The Bible clearly states that speleothems are between one stalactite and one stalagmite, and that it is the stalactite’s role to descend upon the other.”
Peter Saenz retorts that the Vatican needs to mind its own business about what others go down on.
I defer utterly to your superior nerd swag
SHERLOCKIANS AND FANDOM PEOPLE IN GENERAL PLEASE WATCH
LISTEN UP U LIL SHITS I AM ABOUT TO TELL YOU AN IMPORTANT THING
ABOUT A FINGER SLIP
AND REVOLUTIONIZING FANDOM LIFE AS WE KNOW IT OK
i talk about/introduce myself for a brief moment please bear with me this is news you need to hear












